<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1184 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184038</link>
    <description>Imported betel nuts supported by a clearance certificate and a later laboratory report showing substantial damage were treated as a case requiring fresh verification. Where inspection or laboratory findings are conflicting and the goods are susceptible to deterioration, a further test may be directed to establish the correct factual condition before consequential action is taken. Re-testing by CFL and DPPQS was ordered, and further steps were to depend on those reports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:29:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1184 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184038</link>
      <description>Imported betel nuts supported by a clearance certificate and a later laboratory report showing substantial damage were treated as a case requiring fresh verification. Where inspection or laboratory findings are conflicting and the goods are susceptible to deterioration, a further test may be directed to establish the correct factual condition before consequential action is taken. Re-testing by CFL and DPPQS was ordered, and further steps were to depend on those reports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>