<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184034</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the DC(A)&#039;s decision to reject the full deduction of Rs. 32,000 for expenses incurred to earn interest income, allowing only Rs. 3,000. However, the Tribunal admitted the additional grounds regarding the rebate on agricultural income and directed that a rebate of Rs. 19,116 be granted, thereby reducing the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 619 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184034</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the DC(A)&#039;s decision to reject the full deduction of Rs. 32,000 for expenses incurred to earn interest income, allowing only Rs. 3,000. However, the Tribunal admitted the additional grounds regarding the rebate on agricultural income and directed that a rebate of Rs. 19,116 be granted, thereby reducing the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>