https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184023 The SC concluded that the respondent, already enjoying a higher pay scale, should not gain undue advantage over more meritorious candidates. The Court directed her to continue in her current position, with seniority in the Administrative Service per the 15th March 1994 order, placing her last in the seniority list for Category I Assistant Commissioner (KAS). The appeal was allowed to this extent, with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184023 The SC concluded that the respondent, already enjoying a higher pay scale, should not gain undue advantage over more meritorious candidates. The Court directed her to continue in her current position, with seniority in the Administrative Service per the 15th March 1994 order, placing her last in the seniority list for Category I Assistant Commissioner (KAS). The appeal was allowed to this extent, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184023