<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184021</link>
    <description>The text examines whether a statutory power of appointment under the Assam Elementary Education Act, read with the Assam General Clauses Act, also authorises dismissal of teachers appointed under the earlier regime. It states that the dismissal power extends only to persons appointed by that same authority in exercise of its appointing power, so teachers taken over under the takeover and deemed-employment provisions were outside the Assistant Secretary&#039;s competence. It further says a general deeming clause cannot displace the specific provisions governing earlier appointments, and that policy resolutions or letters do not themselves amount to operative termination orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 11:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184021</link>
      <description>The text examines whether a statutory power of appointment under the Assam Elementary Education Act, read with the Assam General Clauses Act, also authorises dismissal of teachers appointed under the earlier regime. It states that the dismissal power extends only to persons appointed by that same authority in exercise of its appointing power, so teachers taken over under the takeover and deemed-employment provisions were outside the Assistant Secretary&#039;s competence. It further says a general deeming clause cannot displace the specific provisions governing earlier appointments, and that policy resolutions or letters do not themselves amount to operative termination orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>