https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184019 The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's removal from service in a case where a sub-inspector of police was dismissed for wrongful confinement. The Court ruled that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing the departmental enquiry, emphasizing that it cannot re-evaluate evidence. It found that the principles of natural justice were adhered to in the enquiry and that the charges against the respondent were adequately specified. The Court dismissed the respondent's petition, affirming the propriety of the departmental enquiry and the respondent's removal from service. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:58:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184019 The Supreme Court upheld the respondent's removal from service in a case where a sub-inspector of police was dismissed for wrongful confinement. The Court ruled that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing the departmental enquiry, emphasizing that it cannot re-evaluate evidence. It found that the principles of natural justice were adhered to in the enquiry and that the charges against the respondent were adequately specified. The Court dismissed the respondent's petition, affirming the propriety of the departmental enquiry and the respondent's removal from service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184019