https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184018 A High Court was justified in refusing to review its earlier order dismissing a writ petition seeking quashing of administrative orders, because the same writ dismissal had already been followed by dismissal of the connected Special Leave Petition. The prior adjudications left no legal basis to reopen the matter through review, and no legal infirmity was found in the impugned refusal to entertain review. The material point is that a review cannot be used to re-agitate issues already concluded by earlier judicial orders on the same challenge. en-us Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:50:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184018 A High Court was justified in refusing to review its earlier order dismissing a writ petition seeking quashing of administrative orders, because the same writ dismissal had already been followed by dismissal of the connected Special Leave Petition. The prior adjudications left no legal basis to reopen the matter through review, and no legal infirmity was found in the impugned refusal to entertain review. The material point is that a review cannot be used to re-agitate issues already concluded by earlier judicial orders on the same challenge. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184018