<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 77 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding transit losses and Cenvat credit reversal. It was determined that transit loss condonation does not necessitate duty credit reversal, as it does not amount to duty exemption or remission. The judgment emphasized the specific provisions under Central Excise Rules and Board Circulars governing such situations, concluding that no reversal of Cenvat credit was justified for transit losses in transporting petroleum products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 77 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding transit losses and Cenvat credit reversal. It was determined that transit loss condonation does not necessitate duty credit reversal, as it does not amount to duty exemption or remission. The judgment emphasized the specific provisions under Central Excise Rules and Board Circulars governing such situations, concluding that no reversal of Cenvat credit was justified for transit losses in transporting petroleum products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>