<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184004</link>
    <description>Consultation with the High Court is mandatory for the valid appointment, continuation, promotion, or absorption of a judicial officer in another service under the constitutional control over subordinate judiciary. Mere notice, silence, or passive acquiescence does not satisfy that requirement, and a move made without the required consultation remains invalid. Where the transfer to legal service is invalid, absorption cannot defeat the officer&#039;s status in judicial service, and the lien in judicial service is not terminated. The High Court&#039;s control also supports repatriation from executive posting when the legal-service placement lacks valid constitutional compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 922 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184004</link>
      <description>Consultation with the High Court is mandatory for the valid appointment, continuation, promotion, or absorption of a judicial officer in another service under the constitutional control over subordinate judiciary. Mere notice, silence, or passive acquiescence does not satisfy that requirement, and a move made without the required consultation remains invalid. Where the transfer to legal service is invalid, absorption cannot defeat the officer&#039;s status in judicial service, and the lien in judicial service is not terminated. The High Court&#039;s control also supports repatriation from executive posting when the legal-service placement lacks valid constitutional compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>