https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184003 A writ of mandamus cannot compel the State to amend recruitment rules in a particular form, because rule-making under the relevant constitutional provision is legislative in character. The direction issued by the High Court was therefore impermissible. The consultative process also required meaningful consideration of the Commission's objections, including issues of classification, seniority, eligibility, and comparative practice. As those objections had not been fully examined, the proposed reservation in judicial service needed reconsideration on the High Court's administrative side before any final recommendation. The appeal succeeded, the writ petition was dismissed, and the High Court was left free to reconsider the proposal administratively. en-us Fri, 06 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:41:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184003 A writ of mandamus cannot compel the State to amend recruitment rules in a particular form, because rule-making under the relevant constitutional provision is legislative in character. The direction issued by the High Court was therefore impermissible. The consultative process also required meaningful consideration of the Commission's objections, including issues of classification, seniority, eligibility, and comparative practice. As those objections had not been fully examined, the proposed reservation in judicial service needed reconsideration on the High Court's administrative side before any final recommendation. The appeal succeeded, the writ petition was dismissed, and the High Court was left free to reconsider the proposal administratively. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184003