https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184000 The amended tribunal framework was upheld as constitutionally valid. A provision limiting a public servant's express approach to the Tribunal against an order, rather than omission or inaction, was sustained because inaction itself remains an independent cause of action and supervisory review under Article 226 remains available. Restrictions on interim relief against suspension, dismissal, removal, reduction in rank, termination, compulsory retirement, reversion and adverse entries were also upheld, as interlocutory stay would often amount to final relief and could create irreversible consequences. The composition and appointment scheme, including consultation with the Chief Justice and an Administrative Member as Vice-Chairman, was found consistent with legislative competence and not arbitrary. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:33:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184000 The amended tribunal framework was upheld as constitutionally valid. A provision limiting a public servant's express approach to the Tribunal against an order, rather than omission or inaction, was sustained because inaction itself remains an independent cause of action and supervisory review under Article 226 remains available. Restrictions on interim relief against suspension, dismissal, removal, reduction in rank, termination, compulsory retirement, reversion and adverse entries were also upheld, as interlocutory stay would often amount to final relief and could create irreversible consequences. The composition and appointment scheme, including consultation with the Chief Justice and an Administrative Member as Vice-Chairman, was found consistent with legislative competence and not arbitrary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184000