<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1088 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183998</link>
    <description>Approval for a technical institution shifting to a new site remains subject to prior AICTE approval, the required no-objection certificates, and an occupancy certificate; a move without those prerequisites, especially without clear title or a registered lease, does not create deemed approval for the new premises. The approval and admission timetable under the technical education framework is mandatory and binding, so courts will not interfere with expert regulatory decisions or alter the prescribed schedule absent illegality or arbitrariness. On these principles, the withdrawal of approval was upheld and the refusal to issue contrary directions was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1088 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183998</link>
      <description>Approval for a technical institution shifting to a new site remains subject to prior AICTE approval, the required no-objection certificates, and an occupancy certificate; a move without those prerequisites, especially without clear title or a registered lease, does not create deemed approval for the new premises. The approval and admission timetable under the technical education framework is mandatory and binding, so courts will not interfere with expert regulatory decisions or alter the prescribed schedule absent illegality or arbitrariness. On these principles, the withdrawal of approval was upheld and the refusal to issue contrary directions was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>