<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 824 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183994</link>
    <description>The AICTE Act, 1987 was held to occupy the field of approval for new technical institutions, so separate prior State Government approval could not be insisted upon by a State law or university statute. The regulations required consultation with the State Government and the affiliating University, but final approval rested with AICTE; any contrary requirement of State approval was repugnant and unenforceable. The State Government&#039;s refusal of permission, based solely on lack of State approval, and the University&#039;s consequent refusal of final affiliation were unsustainable. Affiliation had to be considered on the basis of AICTE approval and other non-conflicting statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:48:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 824 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183994</link>
      <description>The AICTE Act, 1987 was held to occupy the field of approval for new technical institutions, so separate prior State Government approval could not be insisted upon by a State law or university statute. The regulations required consultation with the State Government and the affiliating University, but final approval rested with AICTE; any contrary requirement of State approval was repugnant and unenforceable. The State Government&#039;s refusal of permission, based solely on lack of State approval, and the University&#039;s consequent refusal of final affiliation were unsustainable. Affiliation had to be considered on the basis of AICTE approval and other non-conflicting statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>