<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 960 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183993</link>
    <description>Rent under the lease was treated as Rs. 2,000 per month, supported by the lease deed and the tenants&#039; own correspondence. The proviso to Section 13(2)(i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act was construed to require the Rent Controller to first make a provisional judicial assessment of arrears, interest and costs, and where the rent rate is disputed, determine that rate as part of the assessment. A tenant who complies with the assessment avoids immediate eviction; if a deficit remains after final adjudication, a reasonable opportunity to cure it should be given before eviction follows. The matter was remitted because no provisional assessment had been made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 960 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183993</link>
      <description>Rent under the lease was treated as Rs. 2,000 per month, supported by the lease deed and the tenants&#039; own correspondence. The proviso to Section 13(2)(i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act was construed to require the Rent Controller to first make a provisional judicial assessment of arrears, interest and costs, and where the rent rate is disputed, determine that rate as part of the assessment. A tenant who complies with the assessment avoids immediate eviction; if a deficit remains after final adjudication, a reasonable opportunity to cure it should be given before eviction follows. The matter was remitted because no provisional assessment had been made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>