https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183991 Parliament's power under Entry 66 of List I, implemented through the AICTE Act, 1987, occupies the field of standards, approval, and regulation of technical education. State Government action cannot impose inconsistent or higher standards, or withdraw or derecognise a technical institution on grounds repugnant to the Central Act. The State University's affiliation powers also remain subordinate to the Central scheme and cannot be exercised on inconsistent grounds, including norms for approval, curricula, staff pattern, qualifications, admissions, inspection, or disaffiliation. State enactments and subordinate measures are void to the extent of repugnancy, and the impugned State and University actions were invalid insofar as they conflicted with the Central Act. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:39:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183991 Parliament's power under Entry 66 of List I, implemented through the AICTE Act, 1987, occupies the field of standards, approval, and regulation of technical education. State Government action cannot impose inconsistent or higher standards, or withdraw or derecognise a technical institution on grounds repugnant to the Central Act. The State University's affiliation powers also remain subordinate to the Central scheme and cannot be exercised on inconsistent grounds, including norms for approval, curricula, staff pattern, qualifications, admissions, inspection, or disaffiliation. State enactments and subordinate measures are void to the extent of repugnancy, and the impugned State and University actions were invalid insofar as they conflicted with the Central Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183991