https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183990 Continued occupation after authority to occupy public premises has expired or been terminated constitutes unauthorised occupation under the Public Premises Act, even if the tenant originally entered lawfully. The Act is not limited to initial entry; it also covers continued possession without authority after the premises become public premises and after tenancy termination by notice. The Delhi Rent Control Act and the Slum Areas Act do not bar proceedings under the Public Premises Act, because the later special statute governing public premises prevails over overlapping earlier rent-control or slum legislation. The jurisdiction under the Public Premises Act was therefore upheld and the preliminary objections failed. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:35:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183990 Continued occupation after authority to occupy public premises has expired or been terminated constitutes unauthorised occupation under the Public Premises Act, even if the tenant originally entered lawfully. The Act is not limited to initial entry; it also covers continued possession without authority after the premises become public premises and after tenancy termination by notice. The Delhi Rent Control Act and the Slum Areas Act do not bar proceedings under the Public Premises Act, because the later special statute governing public premises prevails over overlapping earlier rent-control or slum legislation. The jurisdiction under the Public Premises Act was therefore upheld and the preliminary objections failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183990