https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183989 The SC declared sub-section 2A of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, introduced by the Maharashtra Amendment Act of 1984, unconstitutional for violating Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution. The Court found the provision arbitrary, imposing unreasonable restrictions on partners of unregistered firms and depriving them of property rights without compensation. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Bombay HC's decision, and permitting the suit for the dissolution of the unregistered partnership firm to proceed without considering sub-section 2A. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183989 The SC declared sub-section 2A of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, introduced by the Maharashtra Amendment Act of 1984, unconstitutional for violating Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution. The Court found the provision arbitrary, imposing unreasonable restrictions on partners of unregistered firms and depriving them of property rights without compensation. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Bombay HC's decision, and permitting the suit for the dissolution of the unregistered partnership firm to proceed without considering sub-section 2A. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183989