https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183986 A dispute over revised electricity rates fixed by the State Government before constitution of the Board did not arise under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that section 60 could not apply because the matter stemmed from pre-Act governmental action and not from anything done for the purposes of the Act, while section 49 was irrelevant because it governed the Board after constitution. Section 76 was construed as applying only to disputes having their source in, or nexus with, the Act, and not to every dispute between the Government or Board and another person. Arbitration under section 76 was therefore not compulsory. en-us Thu, 15 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183986 A dispute over revised electricity rates fixed by the State Government before constitution of the Board did not arise under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that section 60 could not apply because the matter stemmed from pre-Act governmental action and not from anything done for the purposes of the Act, while section 49 was irrelevant because it governed the Board after constitution. Section 76 was construed as applying only to disputes having their source in, or nexus with, the Act, and not to every dispute between the Government or Board and another person. Arbitration under section 76 was therefore not compulsory. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183986