https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183983 A regulatory order controlling coal trade under the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953 was examined for compatibility with Article 19(1)(g). The licensing clause was treated as invalid because it conferred unguided and unreviewable discretion to grant, refuse, suspend, revoke or cancel licences, making the restriction unreasonable under Article 19(6). By contrast, the compulsory sale scheme and price fixation in clauses 7 and 8 with Schedule III were upheld, as the price formula, locality-based limits and profit margin were not shown to be arbitrary or discriminatory on the record. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:09:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183983 A regulatory order controlling coal trade under the Uttar Pradesh Coal Control Order, 1953 was examined for compatibility with Article 19(1)(g). The licensing clause was treated as invalid because it conferred unguided and unreviewable discretion to grant, refuse, suspend, revoke or cancel licences, making the restriction unreasonable under Article 19(6). By contrast, the compulsory sale scheme and price fixation in clauses 7 and 8 with Schedule III were upheld, as the price formula, locality-based limits and profit margin were not shown to be arbitrary or discriminatory on the record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jan 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183983