https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183980 The Act vested shrine administration powers in the Governor in a special statutory capacity, so those functions were exercised personally as ex officio head of the Board and not on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. The statutory Board was not a controlled corporation for Article 12 or Article 31(2A) purposes, because the Act regulated secular management without transferring ownership or possession to the State. Section 19, which extinguished the baridars' customary right to offerings and provided a statutory compensation mechanism, was held not to attract Article 31(2) or violate Article 19(1)(f), since the right was regulable by law and was not vested in the State. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:03:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183980 The Act vested shrine administration powers in the Governor in a special statutory capacity, so those functions were exercised personally as ex officio head of the Board and not on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. The statutory Board was not a controlled corporation for Article 12 or Article 31(2A) purposes, because the Act regulated secular management without transferring ownership or possession to the State. Section 19, which extinguished the baridars' customary right to offerings and provided a statutory compensation mechanism, was held not to attract Article 31(2) or violate Article 19(1)(f), since the right was regulable by law and was not vested in the State. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183980