https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183979 The High Court's view on the claim to compensation following abolition of tenure was treated as a plausible one and was not interfered with. Since the respondent asserted a right to the compensation amount, the burden of establishing title to that amount was placed on the respondent rather than on the appellants. The order was modified to allow the respondent to file a civil suit within the stipulated time, with that period treated as spent in good faith for limitation purposes, and with consequential directions protecting both sides depending on whether the suit was instituted. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:51:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183979 The High Court's view on the claim to compensation following abolition of tenure was treated as a plausible one and was not interfered with. Since the respondent asserted a right to the compensation amount, the burden of establishing title to that amount was placed on the respondent rather than on the appellants. The order was modified to allow the respondent to file a civil suit within the stipulated time, with that period treated as spent in good faith for limitation purposes, and with consequential directions protecting both sides depending on whether the suit was instituted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183979