https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183978 Quasi-judicial disciplinary and appellate powers under the service regulations had to be exercised independently, so vigilance advice could not operate as a binding command or reduce the authority to a mere implementing body. The executive lacked power to issue a directive compelling acceptance of that advice in individual disciplinary matters because the governing statute permitted only policy directions in matters of public interest. The impugned executive instructions and bank circulars were therefore set aside, and the disciplinary matter had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183978 Quasi-judicial disciplinary and appellate powers under the service regulations had to be exercised independently, so vigilance advice could not operate as a binding command or reduce the authority to a mere implementing body. The executive lacked power to issue a directive compelling acceptance of that advice in individual disciplinary matters because the governing statute permitted only policy directions in matters of public interest. The impugned executive instructions and bank circulars were therefore set aside, and the disciplinary matter had to be reconsidered by the competent authority in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183978