https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183973 The Supreme Court held that an administrative order creating the post of Director General of Police in the Lok Ayukta was valid so long as it was consistent with the governing rules, and the officer and police wing remained under the Lok Ayukta's administrative and disciplinary control. It further held that police officers on deputation to the Lok Ayukta continued to be State police officers for investigation under section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, so the State could validly entrust them with such work. Sections 17 of that Act and 15 of the Karnataka State Lok Ayukta Act, 1984 were harmonised by preserving both powers and allowing further investigation to continue. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:26:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183973 The Supreme Court held that an administrative order creating the post of Director General of Police in the Lok Ayukta was valid so long as it was consistent with the governing rules, and the officer and police wing remained under the Lok Ayukta's administrative and disciplinary control. It further held that police officers on deputation to the Lok Ayukta continued to be State police officers for investigation under section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, so the State could validly entrust them with such work. Sections 17 of that Act and 15 of the Karnataka State Lok Ayukta Act, 1984 were harmonised by preserving both powers and allowing further investigation to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183973