<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 941 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183972</link>
    <description>Departmental letters or long-standing administrative practice cannot alter inter se seniority in the absence of statutory rules, because mere departmental opinions are not the same as binding executive instructions. The distinction between seniority and promotion eligibility remains material, so seniority alone cannot override prescribed promotion conditions. Challenges to settled seniority and consequential promotion claims raised after an inordinate, unexplained delay are ordinarily barred by delay and laches, especially where third-party rights and completed promotions have accrued. The stale seniority dispute was therefore not to be reopened, while only a limited surviving question in one connected writ petition remained for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:24:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 941 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183972</link>
      <description>Departmental letters or long-standing administrative practice cannot alter inter se seniority in the absence of statutory rules, because mere departmental opinions are not the same as binding executive instructions. The distinction between seniority and promotion eligibility remains material, so seniority alone cannot override prescribed promotion conditions. Challenges to settled seniority and consequential promotion claims raised after an inordinate, unexplained delay are ordinarily barred by delay and laches, especially where third-party rights and completed promotions have accrued. The stale seniority dispute was therefore not to be reopened, while only a limited surviving question in one connected writ petition remained for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>