<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183970</link>
    <description>Statutory service rules framed under Article 309 governed promotion, so an executive circular could not create an enforceable right to automatic promotion to Chargeman Grade II merely on completion of two years&#039; satisfactory service. The circular could only accelerate consideration for promotion, while the prescribed selection and screening process under the rules continued to apply; the later governmental orders validly restored that rule-based process. On consequential relief, parity was maintained with the later batch of writ petitions by extending only limited service benefits, not back wages, and no contempt action was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 381 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183970</link>
      <description>Statutory service rules framed under Article 309 governed promotion, so an executive circular could not create an enforceable right to automatic promotion to Chargeman Grade II merely on completion of two years&#039; satisfactory service. The circular could only accelerate consideration for promotion, while the prescribed selection and screening process under the rules continued to apply; the later governmental orders validly restored that rule-based process. On consequential relief, parity was maintained with the later batch of writ petitions by extending only limited service benefits, not back wages, and no contempt action was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>