https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329293 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The original order was dated 09.03.2012 and the appeal was filed on 14.08.2012, which was within the extended limitation period. The HC held that when the SC has described the manner of disposal as illegal, it can be corrected under Article 226 without requiring parties to pursue alternative remedies. The Commissioner was directed to decide the appeal on merits without being influenced by the earlier order dated 30.11.2015, which was set aside. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 May 2025 13:16:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329293 The Madras HC allowed a writ petition challenging the dismissal of an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The original order was dated 09.03.2012 and the appeal was filed on 14.08.2012, which was within the extended limitation period. The HC held that when the SC has described the manner of disposal as illegal, it can be corrected under Article 226 without requiring parties to pursue alternative remedies. The Commissioner was directed to decide the appeal on merits without being influenced by the earlier order dated 30.11.2015, which was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329293