<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 975 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify income related to Mr. Vardhaman Jain for AY 2010-11 and delete the penalty if applicable. However, the penalty was upheld for the remaining amounts, concluding that the assessee concealed income particulars not voluntarily disclosed, based on discrepancies found during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 975 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify income related to Mr. Vardhaman Jain for AY 2010-11 and delete the penalty if applicable. However, the penalty was upheld for the remaining amounts, concluding that the assessee concealed income particulars not voluntarily disclosed, based on discrepancies found during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>