<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 974 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148, citing tangible material indicating escaped income. However, the addition of Rs. 15,65,000/- as unexplained investment was set aside for a de-novo enquiry by the AO to determine the genuineness of the loan transaction from San Finance Corporation. The Tribunal directed the assessee to cooperate with the Revenue for further investigation. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 974 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148, citing tangible material indicating escaped income. However, the addition of Rs. 15,65,000/- as unexplained investment was set aside for a de-novo enquiry by the AO to determine the genuineness of the loan transaction from San Finance Corporation. The Tribunal directed the assessee to cooperate with the Revenue for further investigation. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>