https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329258 The court dismissed the petition challenging the notice to reopen assessment for the assessment year 2008-09. The petitioner objected to the notice being pre-dated and improperly served, alleging lack of proper service and attempted creation of evidence by the authority. Despite the department's arguments supporting the service methods, including personal delivery and affixing in the presence of witnesses, the court found the issue highly disputed and declined to decide on it in a writ petition, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2016 07:20:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329258 The court dismissed the petition challenging the notice to reopen assessment for the assessment year 2008-09. The petitioner objected to the notice being pre-dated and improperly served, alleging lack of proper service and attempted creation of evidence by the authority. Despite the department's arguments supporting the service methods, including personal delivery and affixing in the presence of witnesses, the court found the issue highly disputed and declined to decide on it in a writ petition, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329258