<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3942</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit under Rule 57-G could not be denied merely because the declaration did not mention the final product. The rule allowed credit on specified inputs used in relation to manufacture of final products, and Notification No. 7/99-C.E. clarified that credit should not be refused only because all declaration details were not furnished or some procedural requirements were not met. That clarification was treated as applicable to pending matters, so the denial of credit was not sustainable and the assessee&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3942</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit under Rule 57-G could not be denied merely because the declaration did not mention the final product. The rule allowed credit on specified inputs used in relation to manufacture of final products, and Notification No. 7/99-C.E. clarified that credit should not be refused only because all declaration details were not furnished or some procedural requirements were not met. That clarification was treated as applicable to pending matters, so the denial of credit was not sustainable and the assessee&#039;s position was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>