<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (12) TMI 30 - NAGPUR JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183942</link>
    <description>Depreciation under the income-tax provision was confined to machinery actually used for the purposes of the business during the relevant accounting year. Machinery merely kept idle, even if connected with earlier production or suitable for business use, did not satisfy the statutory requirement. A restrictive reading based on actual employment in earning income was preferred over any negative construction that would extend allowance to unused assets. The claimed depreciation was therefore disallowed and the answer went against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (12) TMI 30 - NAGPUR JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183942</link>
      <description>Depreciation under the income-tax provision was confined to machinery actually used for the purposes of the business during the relevant accounting year. Machinery merely kept idle, even if connected with earlier production or suitable for business use, did not satisfy the statutory requirement. A restrictive reading based on actual employment in earning income was preferred over any negative construction that would extend allowance to unused assets. The claimed depreciation was therefore disallowed and the answer went against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>