<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183940</link>
    <description>Reserved-category candidates appointed or promoted on their own merit against general category posts do not count towards satisfaction of the reserved quota in a cadre, because they do not occupy roster points earmarked for reservation. The roster and running-account principle apply with reference to cadre strength and operate only until the prescribed percentage of reservation is achieved in that cadre. Once that quota is filled, the roster does not continue to expand reservation through later vacancies; subsequent vacancies are filled according to the category of the post vacated. The Court applied this interpretation prospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183940</link>
      <description>Reserved-category candidates appointed or promoted on their own merit against general category posts do not count towards satisfaction of the reserved quota in a cadre, because they do not occupy roster points earmarked for reservation. The roster and running-account principle apply with reference to cadre strength and operate only until the prescribed percentage of reservation is achieved in that cadre. Once that quota is filled, the roster does not continue to expand reservation through later vacancies; subsequent vacancies are filled according to the category of the post vacated. The Court applied this interpretation prospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>