<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 951 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to examine the delay in refund claims and determine entitlement to interest on delayed refunds of additional duty of customs, in accordance with High Court judgments. The Tribunal emphasized that provisions of the Act apply to such cases, despite the revenue&#039;s argument against granting interest without an express provision. All five appeals were disposed of, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:59:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 951 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to examine the delay in refund claims and determine entitlement to interest on delayed refunds of additional duty of customs, in accordance with High Court judgments. The Tribunal emphasized that provisions of the Act apply to such cases, despite the revenue&#039;s argument against granting interest without an express provision. All five appeals were disposed of, ensuring the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>