https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237 A writ petition challenging an assessment order under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 55. The settled rule under Article 226 is that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative appellate remedy exists, unless exceptional grounds such as violation of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction are shown. As the dispute involved factual issues capable of examination in appeal and no sufficient exceptional basis was demonstrated, the writ petition was rejected in favour of the statutory forum. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:54:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237 A writ petition challenging an assessment order under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 55. The settled rule under Article 226 is that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an alternative appellate remedy exists, unless exceptional grounds such as violation of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction are shown. As the dispute involved factual issues capable of examination in appeal and no sufficient exceptional basis was demonstrated, the writ petition was rejected in favour of the statutory forum. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237