https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to quash an assessment order under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The Court held that the petitioner should have pursued the statutory appeal remedy provided under Section 55 of the VAT Act instead of resorting to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Emphasizing the importance of following the statutory redressal mechanism, the Court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to demonstrate the inadequacy of the statutory remedy. The dismissal was based on the principle that when a statutory remedy exists, a writ petition should not be entertained. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:54:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking to quash an assessment order under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The Court held that the petitioner should have pursued the statutory appeal remedy provided under Section 55 of the VAT Act instead of resorting to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Emphasizing the importance of following the statutory redressal mechanism, the Court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to demonstrate the inadequacy of the statutory remedy. The dismissal was based on the principle that when a statutory remedy exists, a writ petition should not be entertained. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329237