https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329236 The Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging a notice under Section 74 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, regarding tax liability on the sale of set-top boxes. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the Deputy Commissioner's jurisdiction and competence to issue the notice. The Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and instructed the petitioner to file detailed objections within three weeks. The outcome favored the petitioner by allowing them to challenge the jurisdiction and respond to the notice accordingly. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:54:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329236 The Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging a notice under Section 74 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, regarding tax liability on the sale of set-top boxes. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the Deputy Commissioner's jurisdiction and competence to issue the notice. The Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and instructed the petitioner to file detailed objections within three weeks. The outcome favored the petitioner by allowing them to challenge the jurisdiction and respond to the notice accordingly. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329236