https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329234 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the revenue failed to prove the appellant purchased the demand drafts. The Court emphasized the revenue's burden of proof and found discrepancies in the evidence presented. As a result, the impugned orders were quashed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:50:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329234 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the revenue failed to prove the appellant purchased the demand drafts. The Court emphasized the revenue's burden of proof and found discrepancies in the evidence presented. As a result, the impugned orders were quashed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329234