<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 937 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 4,33,533.00 due to a low net profit rate was deleted as the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach was deemed unjustified. The addition of Rs. 19,50,000.00 under Section 69 was limited to the peak balance of Rs. 7,81,459.00. The disallowance of Rs. 2,67,234.00 under &quot;Short &amp;amp; Excess expenses&quot; was remanded for fresh adjudication, as proper examination and verification were deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 937 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part. The addition of Rs. 4,33,533.00 due to a low net profit rate was deleted as the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach was deemed unjustified. The addition of Rs. 19,50,000.00 under Section 69 was limited to the peak balance of Rs. 7,81,459.00. The disallowance of Rs. 2,67,234.00 under &quot;Short &amp;amp; Excess expenses&quot; was remanded for fresh adjudication, as proper examination and verification were deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>