<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 935 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT had previously annulled the addition related to unexplained creditors, emphasizing the genuineness of the creditors and lack of transactions during the relevant year. The CIT(A) also supported this decision, deeming the penalty unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty based on the earlier ITAT ruling on unexplained creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 935 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT had previously annulled the addition related to unexplained creditors, emphasizing the genuineness of the creditors and lack of transactions during the relevant year. The CIT(A) also supported this decision, deeming the penalty unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty based on the earlier ITAT ruling on unexplained creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>