<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 934 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty for the excess deduction claimed under section 80-IB and the allocation of head-office expenses. However, the penalty on the disallowance of interest paid on a loan treated as unexplained cash credit was upheld. The decision was rendered on 2nd June 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 934 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty for the excess deduction claimed under section 80-IB and the allocation of head-office expenses. However, the penalty on the disallowance of interest paid on a loan treated as unexplained cash credit was upheld. The decision was rendered on 2nd June 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>