<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 203 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3937</link>
    <description>On opting out of the Cenvat credit scheme and availing small scale exemption, the assessee was not required to reverse credit attributable to inputs in stock, inputs in process, or inputs contained in finished goods by cash payment through PLA. The analysis states that the credit had been lawfully earned and utilised when the final products were dutiable, and there was no one-to-one correlation between particular inputs and the finished goods cleared. In the absence of a statutory requirement to trace validly availed credit to specific goods in stock, the credit already taken could not be denied merely because exemption was later chosen.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 203 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3937</link>
      <description>On opting out of the Cenvat credit scheme and availing small scale exemption, the assessee was not required to reverse credit attributable to inputs in stock, inputs in process, or inputs contained in finished goods by cash payment through PLA. The analysis states that the credit had been lawfully earned and utilised when the final products were dutiable, and there was no one-to-one correlation between particular inputs and the finished goods cleared. In the absence of a statutory requirement to trace validly availed credit to specific goods in stock, the credit already taken could not be denied merely because exemption was later chosen.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>