<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 931 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01 was permissible without the eight-year limitation, in line with the amended provisions of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on judicial precedents supporting the Assessee&#039;s position, concluding that the CIT&#039;s revision was unwarranted. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 931 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, allowing the Assessee&#039;s appeal. It held that the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation from AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01 was permissible without the eight-year limitation, in line with the amended provisions of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on judicial precedents supporting the Assessee&#039;s position, concluding that the CIT&#039;s revision was unwarranted. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 01.06.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>