<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (10) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183929</link>
    <description>The character of a Hindu religious endowment depends on the founder&#039;s intention as shown by the dedication instrument and surrounding circumstances. Here, the will, the provision for management by persons beyond the family, the contemplated continuance after the founders&#039; wives, and directions for future acquisitions in the deity&#039;s name indicated dedication to the public. Unobstructed worship by villagers, installation of the idol in a separate building, regular archaka-based worship, and consecration rites further supported public user. The court held that the Thakurdwara was a public temple and not a private family endowment, and the decrees of the courts below were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (10) TMI 35 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183929</link>
      <description>The character of a Hindu religious endowment depends on the founder&#039;s intention as shown by the dedication instrument and surrounding circumstances. Here, the will, the provision for management by persons beyond the family, the contemplated continuance after the founders&#039; wives, and directions for future acquisitions in the deity&#039;s name indicated dedication to the public. Unobstructed worship by villagers, installation of the idol in a separate building, regular archaka-based worship, and consecration rites further supported public user. The court held that the Thakurdwara was a public temple and not a private family endowment, and the decrees of the courts below were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>