<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 920 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377; 7.5 lakhs within four weeks for the service tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The remaining demand was waived during the appeal process. The appellant&#039;s contention regarding the classification of services provided to M/s. Ansal Properties &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. was rejected, and they were found liable for service tax for the period before May 2006/June 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 920 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of &amp;amp;8377; 7.5 lakhs within four weeks for the service tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The remaining demand was waived during the appeal process. The appellant&#039;s contention regarding the classification of services provided to M/s. Ansal Properties &amp;amp; Industries Ltd. was rejected, and they were found liable for service tax for the period before May 2006/June 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>