<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 913 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. The case centered on allegations of wrongful availment of Cenvat credit without actual receipt of goods and a disputed refund claim of the deposited amount during investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence and thorough examination of records to substantiate claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 913 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. The case centered on allegations of wrongful availment of Cenvat credit without actual receipt of goods and a disputed refund claim of the deposited amount during investigation. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence and thorough examination of records to substantiate claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>