<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 911 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the confiscation of foreign marked gold biscuits, gold ornaments, and cash unjustified. The appellants provided evidence proving the legal import of the gold items and the legitimate source of the seized cash. Despite minor discrepancies, the confiscated items were determined not to be smuggled goods or proceeds from smuggling. Consequently, the goods were ordered to be released to the appellant, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 911 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the confiscation of foreign marked gold biscuits, gold ornaments, and cash unjustified. The appellants provided evidence proving the legal import of the gold items and the legitimate source of the seized cash. Despite minor discrepancies, the confiscated items were determined not to be smuggled goods or proceeds from smuggling. Consequently, the goods were ordered to be released to the appellant, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>