<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 910 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329201</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed against the dropping of proceedings on a CHA license renewal application. Despite findings of unsatisfactory performance and mis-declaration of goods by the licensee, the Commissioner ordered the renewal application to be processed with caution. The respondent was accused of allowing misuse of the CHA license by a G-card holder, leading to violations of regulations. Allegations of mis-declaration of RSP and violation of the Customs Act were also made. The Commissioner allowed the renewal application processing but remanded the case for further adjudication due to lack of evidence supporting allegations of receiving consideration for subletting the license.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 910 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329201</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed against the dropping of proceedings on a CHA license renewal application. Despite findings of unsatisfactory performance and mis-declaration of goods by the licensee, the Commissioner ordered the renewal application to be processed with caution. The respondent was accused of allowing misuse of the CHA license by a G-card holder, leading to violations of regulations. Allegations of mis-declaration of RSP and violation of the Customs Act were also made. The Commissioner allowed the renewal application processing but remanded the case for further adjudication due to lack of evidence supporting allegations of receiving consideration for subletting the license.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>