<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 909 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed delays in the disposal of a miscellaneous application, acknowledged alleged miscarriages of justice in the original appeal order, and recognized legal infirmities in its own order. It assured prompt hearings and fairness, despite objections from Revenue. The Tribunal directed timely actions and alternative hearing arrangements to resolve the issues effectively and ensure procedural fairness, aiming for a just outcome in the pending matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 909 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed delays in the disposal of a miscellaneous application, acknowledged alleged miscarriages of justice in the original appeal order, and recognized legal infirmities in its own order. It assured prompt hearings and fairness, despite objections from Revenue. The Tribunal directed timely actions and alternative hearing arrangements to resolve the issues effectively and ensure procedural fairness, aiming for a just outcome in the pending matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>