https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183912 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Labour Court and the High Court. It held that the casual daily-rated employees had no right to regularization, continuation in service until superannuation, or payment of wages equivalent to regular employees. The Court emphasized the need for adherence to legal principles and the constitutional scheme of public employment, highlighting the financial and operational constraints of the appellant company. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183912 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Labour Court and the High Court. It held that the casual daily-rated employees had no right to regularization, continuation in service until superannuation, or payment of wages equivalent to regular employees. The Court emphasized the need for adherence to legal principles and the constitutional scheme of public employment, highlighting the financial and operational constraints of the appellant company. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183912