<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 894 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329185</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for further examination, instructing it to determine the authenticity of the satisfaction note dated 31.5.2005. The Tribunal was directed to address this issue promptly and allow both parties to present their arguments. The appeal was disposed of, with the court providing responses to the substantial legal questions raised during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 894 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329185</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for further examination, instructing it to determine the authenticity of the satisfaction note dated 31.5.2005. The Tribunal was directed to address this issue promptly and allow both parties to present their arguments. The appeal was disposed of, with the court providing responses to the substantial legal questions raised during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>