<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to determine if the Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering services qualifies as an input service, citing lack of information on certain crucial aspects. The decision was made in response to appeals by the Revenue and the assessee, M/s. Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd., regarding the demand and recovery of Cenvat Credit and related penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to determine if the Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on outdoor catering services qualifies as an input service, citing lack of information on certain crucial aspects. The decision was made in response to appeals by the Revenue and the assessee, M/s. Cummins Generator Technologies India Ltd., regarding the demand and recovery of Cenvat Credit and related penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>