<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329178</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the liability to pay interest under section 201(1A) was upheld based on the failure to deduct tax at source, despite the seller eventually paying the tax. Legal precedents supported the mandatory nature of interest under section 201(1A) until the tax was paid by the deductee, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=432736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329178</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the liability to pay interest under section 201(1A) was upheld based on the failure to deduct tax at source, despite the seller eventually paying the tax. Legal precedents supported the mandatory nature of interest under section 201(1A) until the tax was paid by the deductee, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>